PILOTLEGAL / 01PIL.OT / Legal notice and AI transparency
PIL.OTv0.62.2
PIL.OT / Legal notice and AI transparency

Open about its sources and its limits.

This notice ex­plains PIL.OT’s pub­lic­a­tion status, autonom­ous AI use, cor­rec­tion chan­nel and limits on the use of its con­tent. Last up­dated: 17 July 2026.

01

Pub­lish­er and con­tact

PIL.OT is an in­de­pend­ent private-international-law ob­ser­vat­ory op­er­ated by Ogün Erşan Aydınlı. Pub­lic­a­tion, rights, se­cur­ity, cor­rec­tion and legal no­tices may be sent to info@pil-ot.org.

02

Autonom­ous AI dis­clos­ure

Gen­er­at­ive and rules-based AI sys­tems are used for source dis­cov­ery, triage, scope and date checks, clas­si­fic­a­tion, sum­mary draft­ing, pri­or­it­isa­tion and place­ment in the brief­ing. Some re­cords that pass con­fid­ence thresholds may be pub­lished without prior human review and may later be cor­rec­ted or re­moved. This dis­clos­ure re­mains vis­ible in line with the trans­par­ency ap­proach for public-interest AI text in Art­icle 50 of EU Reg­u­la­tion 2024/1689.

03

Gen­er­al in­form­a­tion — not legal advice

PIL.OT re­cords, monthly sum­mar­ies, trans­la­tions and Pre­vail­ing Winds topic views are for gen­er­al in­form­a­tion and schol­arly mon­it­or­ing only. They are not legal advice, a legal opin­ion, rep­res­ent­a­tion, an offer or a re­com­mend­a­tion for a par­tic­u­lar matter and create no lawyer–client or other pro­fes­sion­al re­la­tion­ship.

04

Ac­cur­acy, cur­rency and dead­lines

Auto­mated sys­tems and source web­sites may con­tain errors, omis­sions, in­cor­rect dates, mis­clas­si­fic­a­tion, trans­la­tion dif­fer­ences or out­dated in­form­a­tion. Do not rely on PIL.OT for a right, ob­lig­a­tion, filing, remedy or dead­line. In­de­pend­ently verify the linked of­fi­cial/primary source, cur­rent law and, where ap­pro­pri­ate, con­sult a qual­i­fied lawyer. If a source con­flicts with a PIL.OT sum­mary, the source pre­vails.

05

Sources, ex­tern­al links and in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­erty

Ex­tern­al links are provided for access to in­form­a­tion and do not imply en­dorse­ment or per­man­ent avail­ab­il­ity. Rights in third-party text, marks, pub­lic­a­tions and data remain with their re­spect­ive owners. A rights, at­tri­bu­tion or take­down re­quest may be sent with the rel­ev­ant source and page URL.

06

Cor­rec­tions, sug­ges­tions and re­mov­al

A fac­tu­al error, wrong date, miss­ing source, in­cor­rect field clas­si­fic­a­tion, broken link or al­leged rights in­fringe­ment may be re­por­ted through the cor­rec­tions chan­nel. The report is checked against the source chain and the record may be cor­rec­ted, nar­rowed, an­not­ated or re­moved. Do not rely on this chan­nel for urgent action or a lim­it­a­tion period.

07

Limits of re­spons­ib­il­ity

To the extent per­mit­ted by man­dat­ory law, PIL.OT does not war­rant un­in­ter­rup­ted avail­ab­il­ity, com­plete­ness or fit­ness for every use. Noth­ing in this notice ex­cludes or limits li­ab­il­ity that cannot law­fully be ex­cluded, in­clud­ing li­ab­il­ity arising from intent, gross neg­li­gence, data-protection law or man­dat­ory con­sumer rights.

08

Per­son­al data and elec­tron­ic mes­sages

Sub­scrip­tion and technical-service data are handled under Türki­ye’s Law No 6698 and, where ap­plic­able, GDPR prin­ciples; de­tails appear in the Pri­vacy / KVKK / GDPR notice. Brief­ings are sent only within the pref­er­ence stated in the rel­ev­ant form. Con­sent may be with­drawn, and no charge ap­plies to an opt-out re­quest under the ap­plic­able Turk­ish electronic-communications rules.

09

Main trans­par­ency ref­er­ences

  • Türki­ye’s Per­son­al Data Pro­tec­tion Law No 6698, Art­icles 10–11 and re­lated rules
  • EU Gen­er­al Data Pro­tec­tion Reg­u­la­tion 2016/679, Art­icles 12–14 and data-subject rights
  • EU Ar­ti­fi­cial In­tel­li­gence Reg­u­la­tion 2024/1689, Art­icle 50 trans­par­ency ap­proach
  • Türki­ye’s Elec­tron­ic Com­merce Law No 6563 and re­lated commercial-message rules

This page de­scribes PIL.OT’s own pub­lic­a­tion and pro­cessing model. It is not a legal-compliance opin­ion for a par­tic­u­lar person or or­gan­isa­tion; man­dat­ory law and of­fi­cial texts pre­vail.

Report an error or suggest an improvement