Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims

H. van Houtte, B. McAsey

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT

Academic publicationInternational arbitration lawGlobal / Investment law18 October 2012

Abaclat and others V Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims

Image: Breather / Wikimedia Commons (CC0) · CC0-1.0

H. van Houtte and B. McAsey examine the relationship between ICSID, the bilateral investment treaty (BIT) and mass claims in the context of the dispute between Abaclat and the Argentine Republic.

The verified scope is limited to bringing these issues together within the context of international investment arbitration. The available material does not support a further assessment of the authors’ method or conclusions.

Open original publication Abaclat and others V Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims

PIL.OT RESEARCH NOTE

Research note

Issue

An article addressing ICSID, bilateral investment treaties, and mass claims in the Abaclat case against the Argentine Republic.

Concepts

international arbitration law academic research international conventions

ACADEMIC CITATION

Academic details

B. McAsey H. van Houtte

“Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims”

ICSID Review · 2012

DOI 10.1093/icsidreview/sis020

Content language: English
Type: Journal article

RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON Zotero

Show suggested citation

H. van Houtte, B. McAsey, “Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims”, ICSID Review, 2012-10-18, 10.1093/icsidreview/sis020. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/sis020

CONTINUE IN THE ARCHIVE

Development summary

Issue

Concepts

“Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims”