PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Abaclat and others V Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims
Development summary
H. van Houtte and B. McAsey examine the relationship between ICSID, the bilateral investment treaty (BIT) and mass claims in the context of the dispute between Abaclat and the Argentine Republic.
The verified scope is limited to bringing these issues together within the context of international investment arbitration. The available material does not support a further assessment of the authors’ method or conclusions.
Open original publication Abaclat and others V Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims
Research note
Issue
An article addressing ICSID, bilateral investment treaties, and mass claims in the Abaclat case against the Argentine Republic.
Concepts
Academic details
“Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims”
ICSID Review · 2012
DOI 10.1093/icsidreview/sis020
Similar records
Academic publication · 15 October 2026Sovereign immunity and compliance with ISDS awards: Recent cases from the USA, UK and Australiainternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 07 October 2026The heirs to the Sultanate of Sulu V Malaysia: Arbitration as friend or foe?international arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 October 2026Conflict of laws in investor-state arbitration and its impact on Ghana’s regulatory autonomyinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 October 2026
