PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
AI Guidelines in International Arbitration: Revolutionary or Cautionary? A Comparative Analysis
Development summary
The article by Dan Perera and Aaron Tan, published in the Journal of International Arbitration, examines uses of artificial intelligence in international arbitration, including arbitrator selection, legal research, document review and predictive analysis. It states that unregulated use may create risks for fair representation and due process, and notes that organisations such as SVAMC and CIArb have developed guidelines addressing confidentiality and procedural safeguards.
Open original publication AI Guidelines in International Arbitration: Revolutionary or Cautionary? A Comparative Analysis
Research note
Issue
Safeguarding fair representation, confidentiality, due process and the validity of arbitral awards when artificial intelligence is used in international arbitration proceedings
Concepts
Academic details
“AI Guidelines in International Arbitration: Revolutionary or Cautionary? A Comparative Analysis”
Journal of International Arbitration · 2025
DOI 10.54648/joia2025041
Similar records
Academic publication · 01 August 2026Nadia Darwazeh and Rémi Sassine’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration addresses irreparable or…international arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Third-party funding and procedural balance in international arbitrationinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 13 August 2026Assignment of ISDS Claims and the Complications for Arbitration and Enforcementinternational arbitration lawAcademic event · 26 August 2026Ku Leuven masterclass to explore arbitration between Statesinternational arbitration law