As­sess­ment of the applicable-law rule after the an­nul­ment of Art­icle 27/1 of the MÖHUK and Law No. 7550

De­vel­op­ment sum­mary

Sinan Can Konyali’s art­icle in the Ak­den­iz Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi ad­dresses the applicable-law prob­lem that arose after the Con­sti­tu­tion­al Court an­nulled Art­icle 27/1 of the MÖHUK and after the amend­ments made by Law No. 7550. The piece dis­cusses the new word­ing through conflict-of-laws con­cepts such as the law chosen by the parties, the law of the place where the work is per­formed, over­rid­ing man­dat­ory rules, public policy and the habitual-residence con­nect­ing factor, and argues that the reform still leaves un­re­solved in­ter­pret­at­ive dif­fi­culties in some re­spects.