PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Challenging investment-treaty arbitral awards in domestic courts on account of investor misconduct
Development summary
Martin Jarrett’s article in Arbitration International addresses how allegations of investor misconduct are advanced by States before domestic courts in investment-treaty arbitration. It surveys States’ challenges to investment-treaty awards, tracks their successes and failures, and maps the emerging case law; the abstract’s bottom line is that domestic courts are seldom receptive to such allegations and that the developing jurisprudence tends to favour investors.
Open original publication Challenging investment-treaty arbitral awards in domestic courts on account of investor misconduct
Research note
Issue
Domestic-court challenges to investment-treaty arbitral awards based on allegations of investor misconduct
Concepts
Academic details
“Challenging investment-treaty arbitral awards in domestic courts on account of investor misconduct”
Arbitration International · 2026
DOI 10.1093/arbint/aiag002
Similar records
Academic publication · 13 August 2026Assignment of ISDS Claims and the Complications for Arbitration and Enforcementinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Book review of Chan Leng Sun, Arbitral Awards, 2nd editioninternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Nadia Darwazeh and Rémi Sassine’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration addresses irreparable or…international arbitration lawAcademic publication · 11 August 2026Methods of Interpretation of International Investment Lawinternational arbitration law