PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Challenging investment-treaty arbitral awards in domestic courts on account of investor misconduct
Development summary
Martin Jarrett’s article in Arbitration International addresses how allegations of investor misconduct are advanced by States before domestic courts in investment-treaty arbitration. It surveys States’ challenges to investment-treaty awards, tracks their successes and failures, and maps the emerging case law; the abstract’s bottom line is that domestic courts are seldom receptive to such allegations and that the developing jurisprudence tends to favour investors.
Open original publication Challenging investment-treaty arbitral awards in domestic courts on account of investor misconduct
Research note
Issue
Domestic-court challenges to investment-treaty arbitral awards based on allegations of investor misconduct
Concepts
Academic details
“Challenging investment-treaty arbitral awards in domestic courts on account of investor misconduct”
Arbitration International · 2026
DOI 10.1093/arbint/aiag002
Similar records
Academic publication · 15 October 2026Sovereign immunity and compliance with ISDS awards: Recent cases from the USA, UK and Australiainternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 07 October 2026The heirs to the Sultanate of Sulu V Malaysia: Arbitration as friend or foe?international arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 October 2026UK’s Section 39A Summary Disposal and European Enforcement Riskinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 30 September 2026Imported models and local practices in OHADA mediationinternational arbitration law
