Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States

L. A. Mistelis

Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States | PIL.OT

§PILOTDEVELOPMENT / PIL.OTAcademic publication

PIL.OTv0.59.0

01Home 02PIL.OT Archive 03PIL.OT ATLAS 04PIL.OT Calendar 05Bulletins 06Method 07About

⌕Search archive

Home/PIL.OT Archive

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT

Academic publicationInternational arbitration lawUnited Kingdom01 June 2005

Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States

L. A. Mistelis0 views

Image: Breather / Wikimedia Commons (CC0) · CC0-1.0

Development summary

L. A. Mistelis’s article was published in Arbitration International. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States.

Open original publication ↗Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States

PIL.OT RESEARCH NOTE

Research note

Issue

The scope of confidentiality and the participation of third parties in the investment arbitrations UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States.

Concepts

international arbitration law academic research cross-border relations

ACADEMIC CITATION

Academic details

L. A. Mistelis

“Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States”

Arbitration International · 2005

DOI 10.1093/arbitration/21.2.211

Content language: English
Type: Journal article

RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON Zotero

Show suggested citation

L. A. Mistelis, “Confidentiality and Third Party Participation UPS v. Canada and Methanex Corporation v. United States”, Arbitration International, 2005-06-01, 10.1093/arbitration/21.2.211. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/21.2.211

CONTINUE IN THE ARCHIVE

MONTHLY BRIEFINGThe month’s important developments, with their sources, in one selection.

Join the briefing ↗

Türkçe görünüm Suggest a correction Corrections policy

This PIL.OT development page is for general information and is not legal advice. The underlying source, current official text and the circumstances of any specific matter must be verified separately.

Design and editorial direction: Dr. Ogün Erşan AydınlıOEA / 26

PIL.OT provides general information. The source text prevails; the publication does not advise on individual matters.

PIL.OT Archive About Method and AI Legal notice and AI Corrections policy Privacy / KVKK / GDPR Contact Suggest a source PILOTBot identity

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT