PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Maghreb Countries
Development summary
The article states that Maghreb laws have moved from hostility toward arbitration and foreign arbitral awards to a more moderate position. It also explains that enforcement laws and rules remain unharmonized and that differing influence from international developments, particularly the UNCITRAL Model Law, helps explain the divergence.
Open original publication Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Maghreb Countries
Research note
Issue
Divergence and possible harmonization of rules for enforcing foreign arbitral awards in Maghreb countries, including the influence of the New York Convention and UNCITRAL Model Law.
Concepts
Academic details
“Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Maghreb Countries”
Journal of International Arbitration · 2008
DOI 10.54648/joia2008017
Similar records
Academic publication · 01 August 2026Book review of Chan Leng Sun, Arbitral Awards, 2nd editioninternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Nadia Darwazeh and Rémi Sassine’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration addresses irreparable or…international arbitration lawLegal development · 14 August 2026ICSID Releases Caseload Statistics for the 2026 Fiscal Yearinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 13 August 2026ISDS Claims Uncovered: The Complexities of Assignment in Investor-State Disputesinternational arbitration law