PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Externalisation of Migration Controls: A Taxonomy of Practices and Their Implications in International and European Law
Development summary
The article develops a taxonomy of practices through which States manage migration flows and enforce immigration policies beyond their borders.
It discusses outsourcing border-control functions, agreements with neighbouring or transit countries, and incentives to other countries, and surveys jurisdictional approaches to the extraterritorial scope of human-rights obligations.
Open original publication Externalisation of Migration Controls: A Taxonomy of Practices and Their Implications in International and European Law
Research note
Issue
The scope of States’ extraterritorial human-rights obligations when migration and border controls are externalised to other countries or non-state actors.
Concepts
Academic details
“Externalisation of Migration Controls: A Taxonomy of Practices and Their Implications in International and European Law”
Netherlands International Law Review · 2024
DOI 10.1007/s40802-024-00253-9
Show suggested citation
Salvatore Fabio Nicolosi, “Externalisation of Migration Controls: A Taxonomy of Practices and Their Implications in International and European Law”, Netherlands International Law Review, 2024-05-01, 10.1007/s40802-024-00253-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-024-00253-9
Similar records
Academic publication · 17 August 2026Legal and Social Uncertainty for Non-Returnable Migrants in Italymigration and asylumAcademic publication · 17 August 2026How Canada’s asylum border has hollowed out refugee protectionmigration and asylumAcademic publication · 21 August 2026Legal Support for Unaccompanied Children after the Migration and Asylum Pactmigration and asylumAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Post-Mullin v. Doe debate on temporary protectionmigration and asylum