PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Foreign Judgments and the Relationship between Direct and Indirect Jurisdiction
Development summary
Richard Garnett’s article examines jurisdiction in the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments through the distinction between direct jurisdictional rules applied by the court of origin at the initial adjudication stage and indirect rules applied at the recognition and enforcement stage. It contends that, outside a federal system or an international convention with uniform rules, there is no compelling justification for eliminating the gap between those two sets of rules.
Open original publication Foreign Judgments and the Relationship between Direct and Indirect Jurisdiction
Research note
Issue
The relationship between the court of origin’s direct jurisdiction and the enforcing court’s indirect jurisdiction in recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments
Concepts
Academic details
“Foreign Judgments and the Relationship between Direct and Indirect Jurisdiction”
International and Comparative Law Quarterly · 2025
DOI 10.1017/s0020589325101000
Similar records
Academic publication · 25 August 2026Insolvency Estate Value and Practitioner Cooperation in EU Cross-Border Casesinternational civil procedureAcademic publication · 17 August 2026Women’s Rights in Vietnamese Private International Law on Marriage and Family Relationsconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 01 August 2026A hybrid model for defining arbitrability in Ghanainternational civil procedureAcademic publication · 25 August 2026Legal Tools in the EU and England and Wales for Cross-Border SLAPPsinternational civil procedure