PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Ii. Regression and Reform in the Law of Domicile
Development summary
Peter McEleavy’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly records that, in the United Kingdom, the law of domicile has remained largely unchanged despite more than half a century of criticism, while other common law jurisdictions have enacted legislation to modernise the concept. It also notes that reform initiatives in Britain have often faltered not on the substance of the proposals, but because of political expediency and pressure from overseas business interests concerned about wider fiscal exposure.
Open original publication Ii. Regression and Reform in the Law of Domicile
Research note
Issue
The need to reform and modernise the law of domicile and its connecting factors in the United Kingdom
Concepts
Academic details
“II. Regression and Reform in the Law of Domicile”
International and Comparative Law Quarterly · 2007
DOI 10.1093/iclq/lei173
Similar records
Academic publication · 04 August 2026The Role of Judges and Arbitrators in Contemporary Dispute Resolutionconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Academic article on the function of standards in private international lawconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 13 August 2026Interpreting transnational law through conflict-of-laws techniqueconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 07 August 2026Directly applicable substantive rules in international transport lawconflict of laws