Investment Disputes after Argentinas Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law

Antoine Martin

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT

Academic publicationInternational arbitration lawArgentina01 February 2012

Investment Disputes after Argentinas Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law

Image: Breather / Wikimedia Commons (CC0) · CC0-1.0

Antoine Martin’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration examines the investment disputes before ICSID that followed Argentina’s reforms after the economic crisis of late 2001. It considers the distinct legal bases of necessity under customary international law and non-precluded-measures clauses in investment treaties, and comments on how annulment committee decisions contributed to that debate.

Open original publication

Investment Disputes after Argentinas Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law

Research note

Issue

Concepts

Academic details

“Investment Disputes after Argentinas Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law”

Similar records

Development summary

Issue

Concepts

“Investment Disputes after Argentinas Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law”

“Investment Disputes after Argentinas Economic Crisis: Interpreting BIT Non-precluded Measures and the Doctrine of Necessity under Customary International Law”