Investor’s Quest for Judicial Security: Reading Ottoman Capitulations from the Contemporary Understanding of International Economic Law
Development summary
The article reads Ottoman capitulations as a historical example of the substantive and procedural safeguards extended to foreign investors. It shows that consular courts, mixed commissions and arbitration-like mechanisms offered solutions beyond the limits of Ottoman law, while the unilateral and extensive use of most-favoured-nation clauses gradually weakened Ottoman jurisdiction over foreigners. It also examines how the pursuit of a more advantageous status operated through foreign-flag shipping and the “protégé” system.
Research note
Issue
The adjudication of disputes involving foreigners under Ottoman capitulations, access to consular, mixed-commission and arbitration-like mechanisms, and the effect of most-favoured-nation clauses on Ottoman jurisdiction over foreigners.
Concepts
Academic details
“Yatırımcının Yargılamaya İlişkin Beklentileri: Osmanlı Kapitülasyonları’nı Güncel Uluslararası Ekonomi Hukuku Açısından Okumak”
Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Vol. 45 No. 2 · 2025
DOI 10.26650/ppil.2025.45.2.1787173
Show suggested citation
Öktem, Akif Emre, Demirkol, Berk, “Yatırımcının Yargılamaya İlişkin Beklentileri: Osmanlı Kapitülasyonları’nı Güncel Uluslararası Ekonomi Hukuku Açısından Okumak”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Vol. 45 No. 2, 2025-09-19, 10.26650/ppil.2025.45.2.1787173. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ppil/article/1787173