PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Issues Arising from the Indeterminacy of the Chosen Court in Jurisdiction Agreements in Favor of Foreign Courts
Development summary
In an article published in the Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Ilyas Arslan addresses the issues arising where a jurisdiction agreement in favour of a foreign court does not identify the chosen court with sufficient specificity. The article focuses on agreements in which the foreign court designated as having jurisdiction remains indeterminate.
Open original publication Issues Arising from the Indeterminacy of the Chosen Court in Jurisdiction Agreements in Favor of Foreign Courts · doi.org
Research note
Issue
The lack of specificity of the court chosen in a jurisdiction agreement in favour of a foreign court
Concepts
international civil procedureacademic researchchoice of courtcontractsinternational jurisdictiondata protection
+1 more
Academic details
“Yabancı Mahkemeler Lehine Yapılan Yetki Anlaşmasında Seçilen Mahkemenin Belirli Olmamasından Kaynaklanan Meseleler”
Public and Private International Law Bulletin · 2020
DOI 10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0011
Show suggested citation
İlyas Arslan, “Yabancı Mahkemeler Lehine Yapılan Yetki Anlaşmasında Seçilen Mahkemenin Belirli Olmamasından Kaynaklanan Meseleler”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 2020-05-15, 10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0011. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2020.40.1.0011
Similar records
Academic publication · 05 October 2026Choice-of-court agreements by non-EU parties in Cabris Investmentsinternational civil procedureAcademic publication · 05 October 2026Choice-of-court agreements in Asia: Party autonomy and court practiceinternational civil procedureAcademic publication · 05 October 2026Distinguishing recognition of proceedings and individual decisions in cross-border insolvencyinternational civil procedureAcademic publication · 15 October 2026Who guards the tax gate? The case for mediation in modern IIA tax carve-outsinternational civil procedure