Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: an analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration

Fabio G Santacroce

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT

Academic publicationConflict of lawsUnited Kingdom24 March 2017

Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: An analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration

Image: Samuel Zeller / Wikimedia Commons (CC0) · CC0-1.0

The work by Fabio G Santacroce examines which law should govern the characterization of preliminary issues as matters of jurisdiction or admissibility in international arbitration. It is a journal article published in Arbitration International, with DOI 10.1093/arbint/aix006.

Open original publication Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: An analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration

Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: An analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration

Research note

Issue

Concepts

Academic details

“Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: an analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration”

Similar records

Development summary

Issue

Concepts

“Navigating the troubled waters between jurisdiction and admissibility: an analysis of which law should govern characterization of preliminary issues in international arbitration”