Protecting Foreign Investment and Public Health Through Arbitral Balancing and Treaty Design
Development summary
Freya Baetens’s article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the relationship between host States’ obligations under investment agreements and their regulatory powers in public health. It states that tribunals ruling on the merits of health measures have shown considerable deference to States under existing treaties, while newer treaties expressly address health considerations through the right to regulate, general exceptions, or article-specific carve-outs; it also notes that GATT-modelled exceptions may be difficult to invoke because of the necessity threshold.
Research note
Issue
How arbitral tribunals balance host States’ investment-agreement obligations against public-health regulation, including the application of right-to-regulate and exception clauses in investment treaties.
Concepts
Academic details
“PROTECTING FOREIGN INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH THROUGH ARBITRAL BALANCING AND TREATY DESIGN”
International and Comparative Law Quarterly · 2022
DOI 10.1017/s0020589321000488