Public Policy Under the Indian Arbitration Act In Defence of the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in ONGC v. Saw Pipes

Sidharth Sharma

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT

Academic publicationInternational arbitration lawIndia01 February 2009

Public Policy Under the Indian Arbitration Act in Defence of the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in ONGC v. Saw Pipes

Image: Samuel Zeller / Wikimedia Commons (CC0) · CC0-1.0

Sidharth Sharma’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration examines the public-policy ground under the Indian Arbitration Act and the Indian Supreme Court’s judgment in ONGC v. Saw Pipes.

Open original publication Public Policy Under the Indian Arbitration Act <i>In Defence of the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in </I>ongc V. Saw Pipes

PIL.OT RESEARCH NOTE

Research note

Issue

Whether a patently illegal arbitral award may be set aside as contrary to public policy under the Indian Arbitration Act

Concepts

international arbitration law academic research comparative law court decisions

ACADEMIC CITATION

Academic details

Sidharth Sharma

“Public Policy Under the Indian Arbitration Act In Defence of the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in ONGC v. Saw Pipes”

Journal of International Arbitration · 2009

DOI 10.54648/joia2009006

Content language: English
Type: Journal article

RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON Zotero

Show suggested citation

Sidharth Sharma, “Public Policy Under the Indian Arbitration Act In Defence of the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in ONGC v. Saw Pipes”, Journal of International Arbitration, 2009-02-01, 10.54648/joia2009006. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2009006

CONTINUE IN THE ARCHIVE

Development summary

Issue

Concepts

“Public Policy Under the Indian Arbitration Act In Defence of the Indian Supreme Court’s Judgment in ONGC v. Saw Pipes”