The Right to Regulate vs Investment Protection: Unveiling the Causes of Imbalance and the Limits of Current Reform Efforts in International Investment Law
Development summary
Berfu Beysulen Angin’s article, published in ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, examines the tension between the right to regulate and investment protection within investor-State dispute settlement. It identifies three causes of imbalance—insufficient understanding and use of the public interest, the absence of universal and systematic evaluative criteria, and a lack of legal certainty and predictability—and concludes that current reform efforts do not adequately address them.
Research note
Issue
The balance between a State’s public-interest regulatory power and foreign investor protection in investor-State dispute settlement, and whether current international investment law reforms adequately address the causes of that imbalance
Concepts
Academic details
“The Right to Regulate vs Investment Protection: Unveiling the Causes of Imbalance and the Limits of Current Reform Efforts in International Investment Law”
ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal · 2025
DOI 10.1093/icsidreview/siaf007
Show suggested citation
Berfu Beysulen Angin, “The Right to Regulate vs Investment Protection: Unveiling the Causes of Imbalance and the Limits of Current Reform Efforts in International Investment Law”, ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2025-01-01, 10.1093/icsidreview/siaf007. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siaf007