PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
The Tension Between Party Autonomy and European Union Law: Some Observations on Ingmar GB Ltd V Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc
Development summary
H L E Verhagen’s article was published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly. The source explains party choice of law in international contracts, the role of the chosen law in regulating the contractual relationship, and Article 3 of the Rome Convention’s recognition of party autonomy; it also addresses the tension between European Union law and party autonomy in the context of Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc.
Open original publication The Tension Between Party Autonomy and European Union Law: Some Observations on Ingmar GB Ltd V Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc1
Research note
Issue
The conflict between party-chosen law governing an international contractual relationship and mandatory rules of European Union law
Concepts
Academic details
“The Tension Between Party Autonomy and European Union Law: Some Observations on Ingmar GB Ltd V Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc”
International and Comparative Law Quarterly · 2002
DOI 10.1093/iclq/51.1.135
Show suggested citation
H L E Verhagen, “The Tension Between Party Autonomy and European Union Law: Some Observations on Ingmar GB Ltd V Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2002-01-01, 10.1093/iclq/51.1.135. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.1.135
Similar records
Academic publication · 18 August 2026The PRICL approach to the reinsurer’s duty to follow settlementsconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 17 August 2026Characterising cross-border contracts where no law has been chosenconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 13 August 2026The development of rules of interpretation in uniform sales lawsconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 11 August 2026European harmonisation in Ukraine’s private international lawconflict of laws