PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Turkish Supreme Courts’ Approach on the Review of Violations of Due Process by Arbitral Awards and European Court of Human Rights’ Case-Law
Development summary
Ipek Sarioz Buyukalp’s article assesses the Turkish Supreme Court’s approach to fair-trial violations in the review of arbitral awards in light of ECtHR case-law.
The text discusses the proof threshold for annulment and refusal of enforcement and a narrow reading of procedural public policy.
Open original publication Turkish Supreme Courts’ Approach on the Review of Violations of Due Process by Arbitral Awards and European Court of Human Rights’ Case-Law · search.trdizin.gov.tr
Research note
Issue
What standards does the Turkish Supreme Court apply when reviewing alleged fair-trial violations and procedural public policy in arbitral awards?
Concepts
Academic details
“Yargıtay’ın Hakem Kararlarının Denetiminde Adil Yargılanma Hakkı İhlallerine Yaklaşımının Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihadı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi”
Kadir Has Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi · 2024
Show suggested citation
Ipek Sarioz Buyukalp, “Yargıtay’ın Hakem Kararlarının Denetiminde Adil Yargılanma Hakkı İhlallerine Yaklaşımının Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihadı Çerçevesinde Değerlendirilmesi”, Kadir Has Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2024-01-31. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1256170
Similar records
Academic publication · 01 August 2026Nadia Darwazeh and Rémi Sassine’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration addresses irreparable or…international arbitration lawAcademic event · 26 August 2026Ku Leuven masterclass to explore arbitration between Statesinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 13 August 2026Assignment of ISDS Claims and the Complications for Arbitration and Enforcementinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 August 2026Book review of Chan Leng Sun, Arbitral Awards, 2nd edition