Uluslararasi Tahkim­de Icra Inkar Tazminati

De­vel­op­ment sum­mary

Necip Fazil Er­bey­in ex­am­ines wheth­er, after en­force­ment pro­ceed­ings without judg­ment have been stayed fol­low­ing the debtor’s ob­jec­tion, an action for an­nul­ment of that ob­jec­tion may be heard in ar­bit­ra­tion. The ana­lys­is fo­cuses on the legal char­ac­ter of the action and its ar­bit­rab­il­ity, as well as the re­lated ques­tion of wheth­er denial of en­force­ment com­pens­a­tion may be awar­ded in that set­ting.