PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Unbounded Personal Jurisdiction Theory and Foreign Policy Concerns
Development summary
Stefano Dominelli’s article in CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL critically examines a recent US Supreme Court judgment that, for the first time, clearly interpreted the due process limits under the Fifth Amendment. From a continental perspective, the author argues that the judgment reinforces the Lotus principle on territorial adjudicative jurisdiction and suggests that heads of jurisdiction may be justified even where there is little objective connection but a strong policy interest.
Open original publication Unbounded Personal Jurisdiction Theory and Foreign Policy Concerns: A Continental View on Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization
Research note
Issue
The Fifth Amendment due process limits on federal personal jurisdiction in terrorism-related claims against out-of-state defendants before the US Supreme Court.
Concepts
Academic details
“Unbounded Personal Jurisdiction Theory and Foreign Policy Concerns”
CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL · 2026
DOI 10.20318/cdt.2026.10287
Similar records
Legal development · 17 August 2026Mauritius Ratifies the Singapore Convention on Mediationconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 17 August 2026Women’s Rights in Vietnamese Private International Law on Marriage and Family Relationsconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 11 August 2026Harmonisation of private international law norms in Ukraine in the context of European integrationconflict of lawsAcademic publication · 01 August 2026