Why good friction matters in international arbitration in the age of AI
Development summary
Bilge Kagan Cevik and Pelin Baysal’s article in Arbitration International addresses the growing use of artificial intelligence in international arbitration through the idea of “good friction”. The authors argue that AI can reduce unnecessary cognitive burdens, but may also weaken the productive mental effort that supports counsel’s advocacy and arbitrators’ independent, critical legal reasoning. The article therefore contends that AI should be deployed so as to remove bad friction while preserving the effortful processes that turn information into judgement.
Research note
Issue
The effect of artificial intelligence on advocacy and on arbitrators’ independent and critical legal judgment in international arbitration.
Concepts
Academic details
“Why good friction matters in international arbitration in the age of AI”
Arbitration International · 2026
DOI 10.1093/arbint/aiaf027