PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
PIL.OTv0.62.2
Réka Somssich’s article in Magyar Jog examines the European Court of Justice’s Cabris Investments decision on the interpretation of Article 25 of the Brussels Ia Regulation, following Inkreal.
According to the abstract, the Court accepts that two contracting parties domiciled or having their registered offices outside the EU may choose an EU court. That choice can confer exclusive jurisdiction within the EU on the selected court.
Whether two contracting parties domiciled or having their registered offices outside the EU may confer exclusive jurisdiction within the EU on an EU court through a choice-of-court agreement under Article 25 of the Brussels Ia Regulation.
Somssich examines the interpretation of the Brussels Ia choice-of-court provision for non-EU parties after Inkreal. The focus is international jurisdiction of the chosen court.
Magyar Jog · 2026
DOI 10.59851/mj.73.09.9