Distinguishing recognition of proceedings and individual decisions in cross-border insolvency
Development summary
Gohar Grigoryan's article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign judicial acts in insolvency proceedings, focusing on the determination of the object of recognition. It treats recognition of cross-border insolvency proceedings and recognition of individual judicial acts within those proceedings as interconnected but legally distinct processes, distinguishing the substantive and procedural effects of judicial acts.
It formulates theoretical criteria for determining the object of recognition and proposes improvements to the legal regulation of recognition and enforcement.
Research note
Issue
Determining the object of recognition in cross-border insolvency: distinguishing recognition of proceedings from recognition of individual judicial acts, their substantive and procedural effects, and enforcement.
Why does it matter?
Grigoryan treats recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings and recognition of a decision issued within them as legally distinct. Separating substantive and procedural effects is central to identifying the object of recognition and its relationship with enforcement.
Concepts
Academic details
“ՍՆԱՆԿՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԳՈՐԾԵՐՈՎ ՕՏԱՐԵՐԿՐՅԱ ԴԱՏԱԿԱՆ ԱԿՏԵՐԻ ՃԱՆԱՉՈՒՄԸ ԵՎ ԿԱՏԱՐՈՒՄԸ”
Դատական իշխանություն / Judicial Power · 2026
DOI 10.59546/18290744-2026.7-9-52
