Proposal for clearer Iraqi rules on international lis pendens
Development summary
Hind Faez Ahmed Al-Hassoun examines the risk of parallel proceedings, conflicting judgments and obstacles to recognition and enforcement when the same or closely connected private-international-law disputes are brought before courts in different states. The central problem is the absence of specific Iraqi rules governing international lis pendens, related actions and provisional measures.
The analysis compares Articles 75 and 76 of the Iraqi Civil Procedure Law with Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012. It recommends explicit Iraqi legislative intervention based on clear and flexible criteria that regulate these matters while safeguarding due process, public policy and the effectiveness of judgments.
Research note
Issue
How international lis pendens, related actions and provisional measures should be regulated when the same or connected private international law disputes are pending before courts of different states.
Why does it matter?
The work addresses how Iraqi law should coordinate the handling of the same or connected disputes before courts in different states. Its comparison of Articles 75 and 76 of the Iraqi Civil Procedure Law with Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 supports a proposal for clear legislative criteria on international lis pendens, related actions and provisional measures.
Concepts
Academic details
“Preventing Conflicts in the Principle of Unity of Disputes in Private International Law: A Comparative Analytical Study in International Law's Lack of Regulation”
Nanar Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences · 2026
DOI 10.64002/vj9z3x69
Show suggested citation
Asst. prof. Dr. Hind Faez Ahmed Al-Hassoun, “Preventing Conflicts in the Principle of Unity of Disputes in Private International Law: A Comparative Analytical Study in International Law's Lack of Regulation”, Nanar Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences, 2026-09-19, 10.64002/vj9z3x69. https://doi.org/10.64002/vj9z3x69
