Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards | PIL.OT

§PILOTDEVELOPMENT / PIL.OTAcademic publication

PIL.OTv0.57.7

01Home 02PIL.OT Archive 03PIL.OT ATLAS 04PIL.OT Calendar 05Bulletins 06Method 07About

⌕Search archive

Home/PIL.OT Archive

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT

Academic publicationInternational arbitration lawGlobal01 December 2025

Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards

Abir al Mahdouri0 views

Image: Samuel Zeller / Wikimedia Commons (CC0) · CC0-1.0

Development summary

Abir AL Mahdouri’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration assesses whether arbitral awards generated autonomously by artificial intelligence can be enforced under the 1958 New York Convention, with particular attention to the public policy exception and due-process safeguards. It examines three central concerns — the requirement that arbitrators be natural persons, the need for reasoned awards, and the risk that algorithmic bias may undermine impartiality and fairness — and, drawing on comparative case law and emerging soft-law guidance, concludes that while party autonomy may in principle accommodate technological innovation, current legal frameworks pose significant obstacles to recognition and enforcement.

Open original publication ↗Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards

Concepts

international arbitration law academic research artificial intelligence comparative law international conventions New York Convention

+1 more

court decisions

ACADEMIC CITATION

Academic details

Abir al Mahdouri

“Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards”

Journal of International Arbitration · 2025

DOI 10.54648/joia2025047

Content language: English
Type: Journal article

RIS BibTeX CSL-JSON Zotero

Show suggested citation

Abir AL Mahdouri, “Public Policy and the Enforcement of AI-Generated Arbitral Awards”, Journal of International Arbitration, 2025-12-01, 10.54648/joia2025047. https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2025047

CONTINUE IN THE ARCHIVE

Similar records

Academic publication · 01 August 2026Book review of Chan Leng Sun, Arbitral Awards, 2nd editioninternational arbitration law→Academic publication · 01 August 2026Nadia Darwazeh and Rémi Sassine’s article in the Journal of International Arbitration addresses irreparable or…international arbitration law→Academic publication · 13 August 2026ISDS Claims Uncovered: The Complexities of Assignment in Investor-State Disputesinternational arbitration law→Academic publication · 01 August 2026A hybrid model for defining arbitrability in Ghanainternational civil procedure→

MONTHLY BRIEFINGThe month’s important developments, with their sources, in one selection.

Join the briefing ↗

Türkçe görünüm Suggest a correction Corrections policy

This PIL.OT development page is for general information and is not legal advice. The underlying source, current official text and the circumstances of any specific matter must be verified separately.

Design and editorial direction: Dr. Ogün Erşan AydınlıOEA / 26

PIL.OT provides general information. The source text prevails; the publication does not advise on individual matters.

PIL.OT Archive About Method and AI Legal notice and AI Corrections policy Privacy / KVKK / GDPR Contact Suggest a source PILOTBot identity

PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT