PIL.OT / DEVELOPMENT
Sulamerica v. Enesa: The Hidden Pro-validation Approach Adopted by the English Courts with Respect to the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement
Development summary
S. Pearson authored the academic publication “Sulamerica v. Enesa: The Hidden Pro-validation Approach Adopted by the English Courts with Respect to the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement” in Arbitration International, published on 2013-03-01. The publication forms part of the private-international-law literature concerning Global / United Kingdom.
Pearson as the responsible institution.
Open original publication Sulamerica v. Enesa: The Hidden Pro-validation Approach Adopted by the English Courts with Respect to the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement
Research note
Issue
The law applicable to the arbitration agreement and its treatment by the English courts in Sulamerica v. Enesa.
Concepts
Academic details
“Sulamerica v. Enesa: The Hidden Pro-validation Approach Adopted by the English Courts with Respect to the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement”
Arbitration International · 2013
DOI 10.1093/arbint/29.1.115
Show suggested citation
S. Pearson, “Sulamerica v. Enesa: The Hidden Pro-validation Approach Adopted by the English Courts with Respect to the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement”, Arbitration International, 2013-03-01, 10.1093/arbint/29.1.115. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/29.1.115
Similar records
Academic publication · 01 October 2026Anti-enforcement Injunctions and the English Courts: From “Rare Beast” to “Common Beast”?international arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 October 2026English law’s approach to arbitration agreements incorporated by reference examinedinternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 15 October 2026Sovereign immunity and compliance with ISDS awards: Recent cases from the USA, UK and Australiainternational arbitration lawAcademic publication · 01 October 2026Aifc Court jurisdiction to enforce a foreign award in Naftogaz–Gazprominternational arbitration law