Gülce Gümüşlü Tunçağil’s article defines the concept of a foreign undocumented worker within Turkish aliens law. The study addresses foreigners who work without a work permit or in jobs they are not legally allowed to perform, and discusses the sanctions applicable to that situation.
migration · asylum · protection
Academic publicationMigration and foreign nationals lawGlobal
Maja Janmyr authored the academic publication “The 1951 Refugee Convention and Non-Signatory States: Charting a Research Agenda” in International Journal of Refugee Law, published on 2021-06-01. The publication forms part of the private-international-law literature concerning Global.
Lina Jasmontaite-Zaniewicz and Júlia Zomignani Barboza examine the use of technology-assisted and automated decisions in EU asylum applications against the backdrop of the growing overlap between migration policy, border control, security and counter-terrorism.
This UNHCR article addresses the legal considerations surrounding claims for international protection made in the context of the adverse effects of climate change and disasters. It was published in the International Journal of Refugee Law and identified by DOI 10.1093/ijrl/eeab026.
Rodolfo Ribeiro Coutinho Marques’s article, “The Arc of Protection: Reforming the International Refugee Regime,” was published in the International Journal of Refugee Law.
This article addresses the temporary protection regime in Turkish foreigners law, which has been applied without a time limit since 28 April 2011 on the premise that the people arriving at the border were temporary and would return, and which is described here as nearing its tenth year.
This 2021 article by Atahan Demirkol and Şahin Eray Kirdim evaluates Turkish migration law through the lens of Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) and asks whether the Third Worldist discourse adopted in Turkey’s foreign policy has any reflection in its national migration law.
This peer-reviewed journal article by Esra Dardoğan Kibar, Doğa Elçin, and Ogün Aydinli was published in Public and Private International Law Bulletin.
Tone Maia Liodden’s article in the International Journal of Refugee Law examines how uncertainty in refugee status assessment creates room for discretion in the Norwegian asylum system.
It was published in the International Journal of Refugee Law, with a recorded publication date of 1 December 2020, and is associated with DOI 10.1093/ijrl/eeab011.
The article examines alternatives to immigration detention in international and comparative law, focusing on how such measures can be understood as restrictions on migrants’ fundamental rights and freedoms that are less severe than administrative detention.
Iker Barbero’s article in the European Journal of Migration and Law examines France’s reintroduction of internal border controls and the rights of migrants in transit.
Daniel Ghezelbash’s article considers how wealthy democratic states evade their international obligations towards refugees and sets out two principal methods: hyper-legalism, an overly formalistic and bad-faith way of interpreting international law, and obfuscation, which works through secrecy…
Fatma Çelik’s article in the Public and Private International Law Bulletin addresses the legal rules governing the residence of foreign victims of human trafficking in Turkey in the context of forced and irregular migration.
This article by Ekin Deniz Uzun examines the relationship between the refugee-crisis discourse and inattentive or abusive state policies toward refugees.
In her article in the European Journal of Migration and Law, Niovi Vavoula assesses law-enforcement access to EU-wide information systems, including VIS, Eurodac, EES and ETIAS, which process the personal data of third-country nationals.
Tom de Boer and Marjoleine Zieck’s article in the International Journal of Refugee Law examines how discretion operates in the resettlement of refugees and whether that leaves a legal void and room for arbitrariness.
Sílvia Morgades-Gil’s article examines how international, European and domestic courts and other institutions interpret the safe third country concept within the Dublin system.