James Kraska authored the academic publication “U.S. Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Measures for North Korea Maritime Sanctions Enforcement” in The Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law, published on 2026-06-01.
Janka Deli and Katerina Linos examine the EU Migration and Asylum Pact as it became applicable across the Union after a two-year transition. The piece sits within foreign nationals law and concerns the EU-level framework governing international protection and related application procedures.
Alessia di Pascale writes that, with fewer than two weeks remaining before the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum becomes fully applicable on 12 June 2026, Member States’ adaptation of their national systems to the new framework remains incomplete.
Georgios Athanasiou’s article in the European Journal of Migration and Law says EU Member States are increasingly relying on national security to justify restrictive migration measures and refoulement at the external borders, and argues that this produces a “securitization cascade” that gradually…
Joseph Choe examines the CBP One app in relation to the American government’s moral and legal obligations towards asylum seekers. The central legal problem is how this digital tool relates to the protection owed to people seeking asylum.
The article examines whether an arbitration clause not written directly into the articles of association, but incorporated by reference to another document, is valid and binding on shareholders.
Mohamed Kamal Arafa Elrakhawi’s work on Zenodo brings French private international law and European private law together in a codification-oriented framework. It seeks to organise the relationship between those two legal layers within a single systematic structure.
Bárbara Mota was announced as the winner of the 2026 GLOBALCIT–Rainer Bauböck Essay Award on the Global State of Citizenship, and her certificate was handed over at a ceremony in Florence on 14 May during the MPC-GLOBALCIT conference on Architectures of Global Mobility.
Marion Panizzon’s article examines how the 2006 France–Senegal Bilateral Migration Agreement is assessed under national immigration law and the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum.
Laura Salzano’s note in the European Journal of Migration and Law discusses the CJEU’s 18 December 2025 judgments in Hamoudi v Frontex and WS and Others v Frontex.
Lukhmonjon Isokov’s contribution concerns the moral geography of mobilities, placing movement and mobility at the centre of its discussion within migration and foreigners law.
The Council of Europe’s 15 May 2026 Chișinău Declaration is presented here as a migration-and-asylum statement that can be read in two ways: as a continuation of the status quo or as a subtle rebalancing of the Convention system.
Alla Barabash considers the place of conflict-of-laws rules in EU regulations within Germany’s private international law system. The article offers a comparative assessment of the law applicable to cross-border private-law relationships.
Mykola Matiiko’s article, published in Chasopys tsyvilistyky, addresses the contractual component of the regulatory function of civil law, private international law and Roman private law.
Merve Acun Mekengeç’s article starts from the point that a jurisdiction agreement is a contract by which the parties, by mutual consent, accept the jurisdiction of a particular court, and then examines the conditions for conferring jurisdiction on a foreign court in maintenance disputes with a…
Nitish Monebhurrun, Leonardo Cavalcanti Da Silva and Maria José Rigotti examine the work and protection of Brazilian migrants abroad through multisited approaches and theoretical perspectives.
This Zenodo article by Diyorakhon Payzullaeva offers a comparative analysis of conflict-of-laws rules in intellectual property. It is relevant to private international law through questions of applicable law and connecting factors in cross-border disputes.
Carlotta Maresca’s thesis at the Università degli Studi di Milano considers how the place of damage should be identified in EU private international law where blockchain investments cause pure financial loss.
The article addresses the fact that EU free-movement law does not specifically regulate the situation of minor EU citizens, so they are often treated merely as family members of their EU-citizen parents.
This Open MIND episode traces the shift in dual-citizenship rules from early twentieth-century hostility to the present-day patchwork of permissive, conditional and restrictive regimes.