Miriana Strippoli’s article in the Journal of Peace and Diplomacy examines international refugee law through a meta-juridical lens in the context of migration governance in a fragmented world.
Ayşegül Dursun and Meltem Ineli Ciğer’s article addresses the protection available to migrants and refugees who travel irregularly by sea under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), together with the duties of states in that setting.
Fernando López Range’s Globalcit post examines the arbitrary deprivation of nationality in Nicaragua. The piece engages the private-international-law dimension through loss of nationality and statelessness.
The Verfassungsblog post on the Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-147/24, Safi, reports that Union citizenship was read as protecting not only mobile citizens but also static minor Union citizens who have never exercised free movement.
Janka Deli and Katerina Linos examine the EU Migration and Asylum Pact as it became applicable across the Union after a two-year transition. The piece sits within foreign nationals law and concerns the EU-level framework governing international protection and related application procedures.
Alessia di Pascale writes that, with fewer than two weeks remaining before the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum becomes fully applicable on 12 June 2026, Member States’ adaptation of their national systems to the new framework remains incomplete.
Georgios Athanasiou’s article in the European Journal of Migration and Law says EU Member States are increasingly relying on national security to justify restrictive migration measures and refoulement at the external borders, and argues that this produces a “securitization cascade” that gradually…
Joseph Choe examines the CBP One app in relation to the American government’s moral and legal obligations towards asylum seekers. The central legal problem is how this digital tool relates to the protection owed to people seeking asylum.
Laura Salzano’s note in the European Journal of Migration and Law discusses the CJEU’s 18 December 2025 judgments in Hamoudi v Frontex and WS and Others v Frontex.
The Council of Europe’s 15 May 2026 Chișinău Declaration is presented here as a migration-and-asylum statement that can be read in two ways: as a continuation of the status quo or as a subtle rebalancing of the Convention system.
Nitish Monebhurrun, Leonardo Cavalcanti Da Silva and Maria José Rigotti examine the work and protection of Brazilian migrants abroad through multisited approaches and theoretical perspectives.
The article addresses the fact that EU free-movement law does not specifically regulate the situation of minor EU citizens, so they are often treated merely as family members of their EU-citizen parents.
This journal article by Leon Rauch, published in the European Journal of Migration and Law, examines the use of border procedures under the EU’s New Pact on Migration and Asylum in processing asylum applications.
Hülya Kaya’s article in the European Journal of Migration and Law reviews how the Turkish Constitutional Court has dealt with the assumption that Turkey functions as a “safe third country” and “first country of asylum” after the 2016 EU–Turkey Statement.
The article addresses whether irregularly staying third-country nationals can be regularised under EU law, focusing in particular on Article 6(4) of the Return Directive.
Chiara Graziani authored the academic publication “Technosecuritization: Digital Technologies and the Securitization of EU Migration Law” in European Journal of Migration and Law, published on 2026-03-31.
The article states that it will examine the scope of States’ positive obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR in cases of shipwrecks involving migrants, including incidents in extraterritorial waters.
Veronica Corcodel’s article in the European Journal of Migration and Law traces the historical development of sustainability as a concept in EU migration law. It looks back at the concept’s legal evolution within that field.
This article by Clara Isabel Cordero Álvarez, published in CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, takes the CJEU’s judgment of 4 October 2024 as its starting point and examines how the public-policy exception under the Brussels regime interacts with fundamental rights, especially freedom of…
Şule Arslan’s article in the Public and Private International Law Bulletin assesses the protection of the right of residence of foreigners and their family members in Türkiye in the light of European Union regulations.
This article addresses the residence permit available to foreign victims of human trafficking under Turkish foreigners law. It examines Article 48 of Law No.