Bronwen Manby’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly examines normative developments in international law on nationality since 2005.
Eleni Polymenopoulou’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly examines the growing role of provisional measures in protecting individual and collective rights within the African human rights system.
Richard Garnett’s article examines jurisdiction in the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments through the distinction between direct jurisdictional rules applied by the court of origin at the initial adjudication stage and indirect rules applied at the recognition and enforcement stage.
Freya Baetens’s article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the relationship between host States’ obligations under investment agreements and their regulatory powers in public health.
Paul F. Scott’s article compares the development of the law governing the use of passports as an instrument of national security in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Niccolò Zugliani’s article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the 2016 Morocco–Nigeria bilateral investment treaty.
Tobias Lutzi’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly examines the problems internet communication poses for private international law’s reliance on geographical connecting factors from the perspective of EU private international law.
Sangeetha Pillai and George Williams address the substantial expansion of citizenship-revocation laws in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia as a counter-terrorism response.
Pablo Cortés and Fernando Esteban de la Rosa’s article addresses UNCITRAL’s draft Rules for Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in the setting of low-value cross-border e-commerce disputes.
The article examines C-509/09 e-Date Advertising GmbH v X and C-161/10 Olivier Martinez and others v MGN Ltd, which concerned alleged breaches of personality, reputation and image rights arising from two newspaper articles available online.
Mariagiulia Giuffré’s article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy.
Zheng Sophia Tang’s article describes significant diversity in Chinese courts’ enforcement of exclusive jurisdiction clauses and notes that some courts may disregard the derogating effect of a valid foreign jurisdiction clause.
Trevor C Hartley’s article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the voluntary assignment of contractual and non-contractual obligations under Article 14 of the Rome I Regulation.
Koen Lenaerts's article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the European Court of Justice's procedural and substantive contribution to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice.
The article examines the application of the European Convention on Human Rights to immigration cases as a balance between human-rights protection and States’ authority to regulate migration flows.
Gus Van Harten’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly examines whether the rise of international arbitration signifies a retreat of the State from classical adjudication.
Peter McEleavy’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly records that, in the United Kingdom, the law of domicile has remained largely unchanged despite more than half a century of criticism, while other common law jurisdictions have enacted legislation to modernise the concept.
Peter Muchlinski’s article, published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, examines the role of investor conduct in applying the fair and equitable treatment standard.
Peter McEleavy; Gilles Cuniberti authored the academic publication “I. Forum non conveniens and the Brussels Convention” in International and Comparative Law Quarterly, published on 2005-10-01.
Elaine Kellman’s article in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly discusses Lewis v Eliades and the relationship between enforcement of judgments and blocking statutes.