Himani Jha’s article, “When Same-Sex Marriage Crosses Borders: Cupriak-Trojan and EU Private International Law,” was published by the Fachinformationsdienst für internationale und interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung on 3 June 2026 under DOI 10.17176/20260603-172930-0.
R. de Barros Fritz’s article in the June 2026 issue of IPRax addresses how the place where damage occurs is to be located, under the Rome II Regulation, in claims seeking repayment of online-gambling losses.
James Kraska authored the academic publication “U.S. Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Measures for North Korea Maritime Sanctions Enforcement” in The Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law, published on 2026-06-01.
The Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters entered into force for the Principality of Andorra on 1 June 2026.
In this second edition, Ersin Yilmaz and Nazim Taha Koçak bring together decisions of the Turkish administrative courts on disputes arising under Law No. 6458 on Foreigners and International Protection.
Janka Deli and Katerina Linos examine the EU Migration and Asylum Pact as it became applicable across the Union after a two-year transition. The piece sits within foreign nationals law and concerns the EU-level framework governing international protection and related application procedures.
Alessia di Pascale writes that, with fewer than two weeks remaining before the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum becomes fully applicable on 12 June 2026, Member States’ adaptation of their national systems to the new framework remains incomplete.
On 13 May 2026, the Working Group on the operation of Article 33 of the 1996 Child Protection Convention held its third online meeting, hosted by the HCCH Permanent Bureau.
Georgios Athanasiou’s article in the European Journal of Migration and Law says EU Member States are increasingly relying on national security to justify restrictive migration measures and refoulement at the external borders, and argues that this produces a “securitization cascade” that gradually…
Ukraine deposited its instrument of accession to the Convention of 25 October 1980 on International Access to Justice on 21 May 2026. The deposit took place at a ceremony at the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the depositary of the HCCH Conventions.
Joseph Choe examines the CBP One app in relation to the American government’s moral and legal obligations towards asylum seekers. The central legal problem is how this digital tool relates to the protection owed to people seeking asylum.
The article examines whether an arbitration clause not written directly into the articles of association, but incorporated by reference to another document, is valid and binding on shareholders.
Mohamed Kamal Arafa Elrakhawi’s work on Zenodo brings French private international law and European private law together in a codification-oriented framework. It seeks to organise the relationship between those two legal layers within a single systematic structure.
Bárbara Mota was announced as the winner of the 2026 GLOBALCIT–Rainer Bauböck Essay Award on the Global State of Citizenship, and her certificate was handed over at a ceremony in Florence on 14 May during the MPC-GLOBALCIT conference on Architectures of Global Mobility.
Marion Panizzon’s article examines how the 2006 France–Senegal Bilateral Migration Agreement is assessed under national immigration law and the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum.
Laura Salzano’s note in the European Journal of Migration and Law discusses the CJEU’s 18 December 2025 judgments in Hamoudi v Frontex and WS and Others v Frontex.
Lukhmonjon Isokov’s contribution concerns the moral geography of mobilities, placing movement and mobility at the centre of its discussion within migration and foreigners law.
The Council of Europe’s 15 May 2026 Chișinău Declaration is presented here as a migration-and-asylum statement that can be read in two ways: as a continuation of the status quo or as a subtle rebalancing of the Convention system.
Alla Barabash considers the place of conflict-of-laws rules in EU regulations within Germany’s private international law system. The article offers a comparative assessment of the law applicable to cross-border private-law relationships.